I picked up a 50ct. box of a hundred and sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I am hesitant to melt away the powder and projectiles on workup when all I've is 50 bullets. But I really want to locate a bullet within the a hundred and sixty course that my older rifle likes.
When it comes to bench relaxation matches, Hodgdon® rifle powders have posted extra wins than all other propellants merged. A fine extruded powder, it flows accurately and with ease as a result of steps and delivers match-grade accuracy when put to use.
It really is probable that no further discussion is required, during which scenario we advise starting off a different thread. If even so you're feeling your response is necessary you could still accomplish that.
Operate your load up with the particular powder (sc or normal) and great deal you might be utilizing nevertheless. Exact same melt away level doesn't suggest it can behave "precisely" exactly the same. I've seen around one hundred fps distinction between sc and mil-surp a lot of H4831.
In any case, I knew The 2 pounds of H4831SC utilised a similar data, but I didn't know whether there was something distinctive concerning a pound of powder labeled "Extreme" and one not so labeled. A call to Hodgdon verified they have been the truth is equivalent and the only real change was The emblem about the label.
Liberalism; The difficult nonetheless approved notion that it is completely feasible to pick up a turd by the clean stop.
Everyone loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the results, any data you may share? Should also mention I've some ELD-X 175's h4831 vs h4831sc I wish to check out, For those who have details on that as well.
excaliber explained: I have uncovered the precise reverse being true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and equally correct powder in my 300 Acquire h4831sc Mag.
At the moment employing IMR 4831 in a very 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a popular choice for this caliber and yields a little bit more velocity. In addition to it staying limited Reduce, what is the real difference in these two powders, and may I change to H4831sc?
Ballistically, this Excessive Extruded powder is the exact duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it's got a shorter grain sizing, consequently, the designation SC or small cut. The shorter, much more compact kernels allow the powder to circulation from the powder steps extra smoothly, helping to alleviate the continuous reducing of granules.
Kansas City, MO I'd grab no matter what is obtainable right this moment. I’ve employed the two even though with my head to load and didn’t see everything diverse functionality smart.
This really is an Serious extruded propellant and delivers heightened insensitivity to cold and hot temperatures.
The two have the Same melt away charge, short Slice comes in helpful Should you be at max fill and not at force/velocity that you'd like you will get extra shortcut h4831sc in the case.
I discovered that my 7mag one hundred sixty partitions had been sub MOA with 4831sc with reduced to min charges. I’m conversing 2700 (probably 2800) fps, it had been a reduced 60s grain demand in a very Norma situation. Not what I was on the lookout for, but precise Nevertheless.